Saturday, August 11, 2007

Analyzing Disease through Constructs of Medicine

The Effect of Apartheid and its consequential socioeconomic factors on the Spread and Persistence of HIV/AIDS in South Africa

Medicine and systems of politics and development are so intricately intertwined that often times they seem like parallel systems to one another. The intermingling of the three especially occurs in the global health and development arena. Disease, for example, can be analyzed as a medical, political as well as a developmental problem which devastates a country. In summary, disease has three primary connotations in the context of South Africa. Firstly, Apartheid led to political and social symptoms of instability as many native black South Africans were dislocated from their homeland and lost their citizenship and voting rights. [1] Secondly, Apartheid along with the socioeconomic factors which it created spurred the spread and persistence of HIV/AIDS which affected vast number of individuals who were not able to sustain themselves in the work force and suffered a great amount.[2] Furthermore, certain cultural practices and beliefs also predisposed the population to HIV. Thirdly, the process of development in South Africa can be perceived as diseased itself primarily because the development programs and disease interventions do not take into account socio-cultural factors which affect a region making intervention methods futile and wasteful. Finally, systems of politics, medicine and development are themselves flawed due to various factors of ignorance, greed and the notion of superiority and paternalism.

Apartheid, which led to the strict segregation among the races, was instated from 1948 to 1994. Apartheid led to empowering the minority European elite which controlled much of the socioeconomic and political power in the country. The segregation took away voting rights and citizenship of individuals who resided in South Africa but were not of European descent.[3] The Apartheid assigned locations to which people were forced to migrate. The schools and medical systems were completely segregated but the black South Africans were not provided with the same technology and expertise as those of the minority elite. [4]This not only created a deep divide in society but also lead to very poor health, education and living conditions for the black South Africans.

Apartheid can be perceived as a form of continuation of colonialism where a small European minority still controlled much of the resources. Because the labor reserve was still in South Africa, individuals from all the surrounding areas were forced to travel long distances in order to find suitable work.[5] Furthermore, this provided the European elite with a cheap source of labor as many native black South Africans had no choice but to work in poor conditions with low pay and long hours. This system also dehumanized the individuals as men were expected to stay far away from their families for long periods of times and were forced to work in dire conditions. [6] Furthermore, they were mainly used in order to provide a source of economic profit and surplus for the European elite. Although the working population was black, the economic power still remained in the hands of the small European elite. The minority elite owned 80% of the land and received 75% of the national income of the country whereas the black majority received less that 20% of the national income during the Apartheid era.[7] The elite continued to exploit the black workers in order to gain economic prosperity for themselves and continued to treat the black majority unfairly and unjustly by providing them with no share of the profits.

The segregation which was initially implemented to be “separate but equal” turned out to be systems which were very separate but far from equal. This segregation actually empowered the white elite as they were able to deny access to proper health care, education, and sanitation to the black majority. The black majority had a ratio of 1 doctor for every 44,000 individuals while the minority had 1 doctor for every 400 individuals. Annual expenditure on education was only $45 for a black pupil while $696 was allocated for each white pupil. [8] These figures clearly indicate that these two groups were segregated into a system which treated the black majority unfairly and unjustly. Apartheid and its devastating consequences during and after this terrible implementation can be classified as a disease which deeply struck South Africa.

The disease in the political system lies in the very fact that a system is not able to adequate sufficient amount of care for individuals who are most in need. ‘Politics of the belly’ ruled the governance of the country as the minority European elite mistreated the black majority.[9] The symptoms of the diseased political state can be perceived thorough various ways in the case of South Africa. Firstly, the black majority were given poor wages along with poor working conditions. Secondly, the black education and health care systems were so poorly facilitated that it hindered black individuals from accessing white collar jobs and a healthy lifestyle. The white elite intentionally deprived the black majority of much of the country’s resources in order to ensure that they did not access the power to overthrow the elite. Therefore, the black majority were even deprived of proper sanitation which led to further spread of illness and disease. This corruption in the political system was practiced in order to deny accessibility of the political systems of power for the black majority as the European minority wanted to manipulate the black majority. Disease is also indicated by the misallocation of funds which deprived the black majority from the accessibility to proper treatment. [10]

A disease in the more physiological system indicates weakness and suffering of the individual. This may range from the weakness of the immune system which leads to other infections due to the body’s state as well as the direct symptoms of the disease which may range from severe vomiting to fever. An epidemic leaves a population devastated as it affects a large population. An epidemic like AIDS leads to a great number of individuals in the older and younger brackets but eradicates the working class. This has created a huge crisis as individuals who are left are either too young or too old to work. [11]

HIV began to rein havoc in South Africa for various socioeconomic reasons escalated by the apartheid. The National Health Department in South Africa reported that the number of cases of HIV between 1991 to1993 increased by 60% in the span of those two years.[12] Initially, Apartheid led to a mass dislocation of individuals from one area to another leading to spread of disease from one isolated area to many new areas. The influx of men in South Africa who were away from their families led not only to the growth of the sex industry in the area but also lead to the sporadic spread and outburst of HIV. [13] Since promiscuity was often times seen as a sign of masculinity in the black South African culture, the men in these conditions often times would seek the solace of a prostitutes in times of loneliness and distress. [14] HIV also had various cultural implications for women.

Because a woman’s power in requesting a condom is not taken or even considered, women are highly subjected to HIV. For instance, males in South Africa sometimes practice “dry sex” in which the women is intentionally wiped dry in order to increase the sensational pleasure for the man. This practice makes the woman’s vaginal canal more prone to bleeding, further leading to the spread of HIV. [15] Women hold a subordinate role in society making them more susceptible to coercive or this type of unwanted sexual behavior. It is estimated that 80% of rural South African women are victims of domestic or sexual violence.[16] “One in every three women in SA is in an abusive relationship, a woman is killed by her partner every six days and there is a rape every 35 seconds.”[17]Often times women are also economically dependent on the male members in their life, and economic stability is sometimes conditional upon the consent to have sex. [18] For the reason that HIV/AIDS is looked upon highly negatively in society, women and men who know they are HIV positive are discouraged from speaking out to their partner. Additionally, if the sexual intimacy does lead to pregnancy, the child also contracts the disease in some circumstances if adequate treatment is not allocated. Women also have a higher likelihood of infection when exposed to HIV. Furthermore, even if women are monogamous there is no guarantee that the males in the relationship are the same way. Men who are promiscuous are often times considered more masculine and therefore having multiple sex partners is, in a way, encouraged from a cultural stand point. Therefore, the spread of HIV is also further spurred by various cultural influences. [19]

Some reports also indicate that Apartheid led to a huge loss of the notion of a family in the black South African culture. Men spent most of the year away from their wives and children which led to the loss of culture and tradition in the native black South African population. Because fathers were so far away from home, the family unit was utterly destroyed. Some scholars also argue that the location of labor reserve actually hindered the reproduction and growth of the black population in and around South Africa as such a large population of men spent such long spans of time away from their wives. [20]

Additionally, when couples do have an opportunity to see each other, they are more likely to engage in unprotected sex as the very notion of a “condom” is often seen as a means of promoting promiscuity and disrupting child bearing. A woman who proposes to use a condom can be construed as ‘lose’ by her very suggestion to use protection with her partner despite the fact that it is socially acceptable for her male partner to have multiple sexual partners. Condoms are also perceived as uncomfortable and unnatural in monogamous relationships. Because the development and disease intervention specialists may not take into cultural factors of this sort into, this leads to inadequate methods of support and help. This is one of the primary examples of why health intervention fails in implementation. For example, in this situation many lecture about condoms may be given, and the individuals in a certain population may be given the access to condoms, however, if an individuals sees the condom as a hindrance of reproduction, this contraceptive method may be hindered and not practiced. Furthermore, individuals do not see condoms as a sign of protection but rather view is as a method for promiscuity. Moreover, because men have more social power, they may feel further empowered by the notion of using no protection and somehow see a condom as a form of entrapment or rejection. [21]

In addition another reason of project failure may be due to the notion of westerm superiority. An organization which goes into these developing countries for a project or a clinic sometimes makes the assumption that locals have little or no knowledge and that in some way these individuals are inadequate. Until western health care system and development systems are able to recognize other individuals in these countries as different instead of inferior it may help further. Flipping through the World Bank pages of the “end poverty” year report is filled with glossy pictures of individuals from all parts of the world yet all of these pictures seem to have something in common. There is usually a westerner intervening and this foreign intervention is somehow portrayed as a godsend to these people. Nevertheless development and health projects are appreciated but this notion of superiority does not help the pursuit of development rather builds a greater divide between the haves and have nots. [22]

The greed of economic profit and prosperity can also be seen as a form of disease in all three systems of medicine, politics and development. In medicine, large pharmaceutical companies hold much of the power and seek markets which are most profiting to the company. These companies do not necessarily want to cure disease as a cure of any disease would lead to a decline in the sale of a particular drug. The companies are far more concerned with the profits it seeks. [23] Therefore their goal lies in the fact that they want a population who are infected by a disease dependent on the medication as this would provide a constant source of profit for their companies. Although medications which slow down the progression of HIV in an individual are in existence, a drug company does not see a profitable interest in providing medication for the numerous infected both in South Africa as well as other parts of sub-Saharan Africa. These individuals are not able to pay large amounts of money for the medications and therefore pharmaceutical countries would rather invest in countries where individuals have the financial capacity to overpay for medications. In political terms, the climate in South Africa due to Apartheid created a fertile ground for the minority European elite to control much of the economic power. A small minority continued to exploit numerous workers and ensured the inaccessibility to proper health care, nutrition and education of the black majority in order to protect their own selfish economic interests. In terms of development, the development process itself involves a great amount of money and investment from various large organizations. For example, the development process involves an array of analysts, reporters, managers, economists along with various other employment positions which play various roles in the process. The process of development is done in a manner which most benefits the large organizations which possess much of the power. Investing time and effort in order to explore the cultural and social factors of each and every location would indicate that developers would have to spend much time and energy in these endeavors. Development projects are therefore executed and implemented in a very superficial level as this allows development workers to move from one location to another in a fairly quick manner. Furthermore, in order to spur a real growth and change in any society requires a very intimate familiarity with that culture. Development managers therefore do not have the time nor the resources in order to heavily invest. Therefore, this leads to numerous development projects yet a low success rate as the institutions implementing these projects do not evaluate cultural and social influences. [24]

Both western medicine as well as western development always seems to yearn for hard facts and data sets which can be easily manipulated and redistributed. Medicine like development cannot necessarily be standardized in every way and form into each society or individual. Whether as a doctor or as an economist, an individual needs to realize the importance of cultural impact and cultural significance. The failures of these development projects and the failures of trying to eradicate disease is not because the intentions are not good or just, but perhaps that these intentions are not carried out in the proper cultural context in which these intentions ought to be carried out. When looking at medicine it is so much easier to systemize and categorize every symptom and every disease. Every condition is given its own name then why are individuals not? It is perhaps this discrepancy between treating a patient for an illness vs. understanding the patient with the illness which leads to the various failures in development as well as health interventions around the world. The large inadequacy of western medicine lies in the fact that often times finding the cure may not necessarily be the answer. As for in medical practices, the political systems of development face a similar situation. The disease of corruption, “politics of the belly” and red tape bureaucracy may never end, however some changes in infrastructure and policy among these political systems may allow for a positive future. Recognizing that finding a cure for all the diseases which exist today would be a nice solution, however, this would certainly not solve all the complexities of disease which will continue to exist despite of cures. There is likelihood that even though all the disease of today’s world may be cured, another disease or virus may very easily arise and devastate the population again. Although this “disease” can be one which weakens the individuals physically, politically, socially or economically, the diagnosis and treatment per say needs to be customized in the context of cultural and social factors of the location. Medicine should perhaps be more focused on disease preparedness and prevention rather than eradication. Although one does not have a way of knowing what diseases or how these diseases will come about, massively increasing public health interventions will definitely help.



[1] http://www.un.org/av/photo/subjects/apartheid.htm

[2] Post-Apartheid South Africa: the First Ten Years

[3] http://www.un.org/av/photo/subjects/apartheid.htm

[4] Post-Apartheid South Africa: the First Ten Years

[5] Post-Apartheid South Africa: the First Ten Years

[6] http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Apartheid.html

[7] http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~cale/cs201/apartheid.hist.html

[8] http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~cale/cs201/apartheid.hist.html

[9] Source Citation: Nevin, Tom. "Apartheid era crooks exposed: a damning new report exposes instances of deeply entrenched grand corruption involving high ranking politicians and businessmen during the apartheid era. The report gives the lie to perceptions that corruption in South Africa is a post-democracy era phenomenon. Tom Nevin reports.(Apartheid Grand Corruption)." African Business 322 (July 2006): 44(2). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[10] Source Citation: Nevin, Tom. "Apartheid era crooks exposed: a damning new report exposes instances of deeply entrenched grand corruption involving high ranking politicians and businessmen during the apartheid era. The report gives the lie to perceptions that corruption in South Africa is a post-democracy era phenomenon. Tom Nevin reports.(Apartheid Grand Corruption)." African Business 322 (July 2006): 44(2). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[11] http://www.avert.org/aidssouthafrica.htm

[12] http://www.avert.org/aidssouthafrica.htm

[13] Source Citation: Suich, Alexandra. "Women and AIDS in South Africa: a conflicted history leads to a dispiriting present." UN Chronicle 43.2 (July-August 2006): 12(3). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[14] http://www.avert.org/aidssouthafrica.htm

[15] Source Citation: Tshabalala, Lerato, and Suzy Brokensha. "Would you put any of these into your vagina? Of course not. But hundreds of thousands of women in South Africa do every day. Is "DRY SEX" one of the hidden reasons for the country's horrifying AIDS epidemic?(investigation)." Marie Claire 12.4 (April 2005): 203(3). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[16] http://www.engenderhealth.org/news/newsreleases/040305.html

[17] http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Urgent_Action/apic_82299.html

[18] Source Citation: "In Soweto, South Africa, transactional sex may increase women's risk of HIV." Women's Health Weekly (Nov 4, 2004): 18. InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[19] Source Citation: Suich, Alexandra. "Women and AIDS in South Africa: a conflicted history leads to a dispiriting present." UN Chronicle 43.2 (July-August 2006): 12(3). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[20] [20] Post-Apartheid South Africa: the First Ten Years

[21] Source Citation: Maharaj, Pranitha, and John Cleland. "Condom use within marital and cohabiting partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa." Studies in Family Planning 35.2 (June 2004): 116(9). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[22] Seeing Like a State

[23] Source Citation: Silverman, Jennifer. "Where drug dollars go. (Policy & Practice).(Brief Article)." Family Practice News 32.16 (August 15, 2002): 34(1). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

[24] Andersen, Martin Edwin. "Oversight crisis at development banks: slashed wrists, blood-smeared offices and workers too terrified to complain: what can be done to root out alleged corruption at the world's development banks? (The world: multilateral finance)." Insight on the News 19.6 (March 4, 2003): 32(2). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. University of Virginia Library. 28 Nov. 2006
.

No comments: